10-10-2019; Pancake House Fall-Down Denied; The Other Half of Our Marijuana in the Workplace Presentation and more

Synopsis: Pancake House Fall Down Denied by IL Appellate Court.

Editor’s comment: In a mildly surprising but legally well-founded ruling, a unanimous ruling from the IL Appellate Court, WC Division considered facts about a worker who suffered somewhat severe injuries prior to getting to work.

In Walker Brothers, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n, (issued September 13, 2019), the IL WC Commission awarded Claimant medical, temporary total disability (TTD), and permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits. Claimant was seriously injured when he had parked his car and was walking, heading to work, and fell on ice in a retail store parking lot not owned nor maintained by his employer.

The worker and other restaurant employees were allowed to park in the other lot because the restaurant parking lot was felt to be too small for customers, vendors and employees. The Appellate Court ruling by Justice Holdridge noted there was no evidence that the employer controlled or maintained the other retail store’s parking lot. The parking lot where the worker fell was not part of a route “going to or coming from” that was required by the employer.

Basically, Claimant was on his way to work but hadn’t gotten close enough to be able to make a valid IL WC claim for his unfortunate injuries. 

Evidence of record indicated the employer had no designated employee parking lot. Further, pursuant to an “informal agreement with” the adjoining store, some employees parked in the parking lot where the fall took place “across the street and down half a block.” However, the employer did not pay the nearby business for use or maintenance of the lot. There was also evidence the employer’s employees were allowed to use only the section of parking spots furthest away from the retailer’s entryway and the Walker Bros. employees do not receive any priority over the retailer’s customers. A rep from the employer explained the employer’s employees have other options for parking, such as side street parking that required no payment or permit, and not all of the employer’s employees parked in the retailer’s parking lot.

For all those reasons, the unanimous Appellate Court reversed the IL WC Commission panel and held the injuries suffered did not arise out of or in course of his employment with the employer. Please note the worker might have been able to bring a common law claim for inadequate maintenance of the lot by its owner.

 

Synopsis: More on Marijuana in Your Workplace from Gene Keefe and Matt Ignoffo.

 

Editor’s comment: This is the other half of our presentation highlights. If you want a presentation/webinar on the topic, send a reply.

 

How to Best Deal With Marijuana in the Workplace—DON’T.

 

  • We have clients across the U.S. asking about the optimal approach to marijuana in their work sites

 

  • We recommend an easy approach to this issue—start now and forever ban marijuana in your workplace

 

  • Make all workers aware you won’t tolerate impaired work activities, as it is dangerous to be impaired at any job, any place.

 

  • All states we are aware of allow you to legally stop the use or impairment from marijuana in your work sites

 

  • If you don’t act before you get a medical marijuana user asking about it and you block that user and then start to ban its use, you are almost certainly looking at a discrimination action

 

Illinois is the Eleventh State to Legalize Marijuana and Our New Law is Clearly Contradictory

 

  • On June 25, 2019, Governor Pritzker signed into effect House Bill 1438—the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act (“CRTA”).

 

  • The CRTA, which is set to take effect on January 1, 2020, leaves open questions for employers, but there are a few important features with which Illinois employers should quickly become familiar.

 

Prohibitions on Disciplining or Discharging Employees for Off-Duty Consumption—But You Should Be Able to Discipline Impaired Workers

 

  • The CRTA differs from many state laws legalizing recreational marijuana in that it explicitly protects an employee’s right to consume marijuana during off-duty hours. To me, that is just odd.

 

  • By contrast, in some states that have legalized recreational consumption, employers remain free to adopt and enforce policies prohibiting employees from using marijuana both on and off-the-job.

 

Illinois Still Protects Employers and Allows Them to Punish Users Who are Impaired

 

  • The CRTA will amend Illinois’s Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act, which prevents employers from disciplining or discharging employees for using “lawful products off the premises of the employer during nonworking hours.”

 

  • The CRTA will define the previously undefined phrase “lawful products” to mean “products…legal under state law.”

 

  • This is a noteworthy change because marijuana is still illegal at the federal level.

 

  • By defining “lawful products” to mean those products that are legal at a state level, the CRTA appears to prevent employers from disciplining or discharging employees for recreationally using marijuana during off-duty hours. Notably however, federally regulated employers, such as those subject to federal DOT regulation, are carved out from this exemption.

 

Employers May Continue Drug Testing and Prohibit Working Under the Influence

 

  • Under the CRTA, employers retain the ability to adopt and enforce “reasonable zero tolerance or drug free workplace policies, or employment policies concerning drug testing, smoking, consumption, storage, or use of cannabis in the workplace or while on call.”

 

  • The only explicit restrictions on these policies are that employees will not be considered to be “on-call” unless they have had at least 24-hours’ notice, and drug policies must be “applied in a nondiscriminatory manner.”

 

Consider Melding Marijuana Impairment, Testing and Discipline to Opioid Bans

 

  • You and everyone who might ever sit on a jury knows someone using either marijuana or opioids at work is impaired at a relatively significant level

 

  • Under the theory of respondeat superior, employers are typically legally responsible for actions of their workers which they can “reasonably expect” the workers to do

 

  • If your worker smashes into a school bus and injures lots of people and it is found you knew that worker was using marijuana or opioids with your knowledge and permission, the outcome could bankrupt your company

 

Our advice is ban marijuana and opioid use/impairment in your workplace—if you need our policy, let us know.

 

I appreciate your thoughts and comments. Please post them on our award-winning blog.

 

10-3-2019; Gene Keefe and Matt Ignoffo on Dealing With Marijuana/THC in Your Workplace--Part 1; IL Appellate Ct Rules IL Employers Don't Have to Pay Unaccrued PPD and more

Synopsis: Gene Keefe and Matt Ignoffo on Dealing With Marijuana/THC in the Workplace for Illinois and Other States. Part 1; Part 2 Next week.

 

Editor’s comment: Gene and Matt have developed a great presentation for your managers or the OccHealth Department of any hospital. If you are interested in a presentation and/or webinar, send a reply.

 

Here are the salient points on Marijuana in the Workplace.

First

 

  1. Understand the laws on Marijuana/THC and prescription medications that are specific to your State;​

 

  1. Adopt a pre-duty prescription medication and impairing substances safety policy;​

 

  1. Update job descriptions;​

 

  1. Let employees know your stance on Marijuana/THC and prescription meds and their use at work​

 

Remember, Current Testing for Marijuana Is NOT Precise

 

  1. Current testing for marijuana use will only confirm the presence of Marijuana/THC in the user’s system for as long as 30 days.

 

  1. Unlike alcohol or COH, you can’t confirm blood THC levels, like you can confirm blood alcohol levels.

 

  1. This makes it more challenging to measure, demonstrate and rein in “impairment” or what a factor varying Marijuana/THC levels might cause.

 

  1. For that reason and others, we feel it better just to draw the line—no marijuana/THC use at your work sites.

 

  1. Enforcement and safety are the challenges.

 

Testing for Impairment is Possible but Certain to be Legally Challenging

 

  • Police in California and other states have developed DRE’s or Drug Recognition Expert evaluations to try to keep stoned drivers off their roads.

 

  • The same “math” may soon apply in your workforce.

 

  • You might want to consider having one or several managers undertake the DRE process.

 

 

Matt and I suggest you Adopt A Pre-duty Prescription Medication & Impairing Substance Safety Policy

 

  • Requires employees working in safety-sensitive classification to disclose that they have taken an impairing effect prescription or other substance;

 

  • Define safety-sensitive and list job classifications as possible;

 

  • Make it part of the your overall safety policy;

 

  • Once disclosed, you, as the employer reserve the right to send employee for fitness-for-duty evaluation with copy of your new safety-focused job description;

 

  • Encourages employees to first provide their own physician a copy of their job description and make a fitness-for-duty determination; and

 

  • You as the employer reserve your right to make final fitness-for-duty determination, maybe using a Medical Review Office (MRO).

 

We also recommend you update your job descriptions

  • Every job description has to be in compliance with the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) and should list “Essential Job Functions.”

 

  • If the employee works in a safety-sensitive job category, one of the essential functions listed should be “the ability to work in a constant state of alertness and in a safe manner.”

 

  • Educate yourself on the workplace related impairing effects of Marijuana/THC

 

    • Marijuana/THC causes an inability to concentrate or remain focused on a single thought or idea.

    • It also causes increased drowsiness, fatigue and lethargy.

    • Your workers will have an inability to accurately gauge lengths of time and distance as well as impairment of hearing and vision and short term memory.

    • Your impaired workers may have an inability to cope with sudden changes in surrounding and/or emergency situations.

    • It is possible for them to have visual and/or auditory hallucinations.

    • Finally, you might expect a non-caring, uncommitted, unconcerned attitude.

 

How To Best Deal with Marijuana/THC in your Workplace—Don’t!!!!

 

  • We have clients across the U.S. asking about the optimal approach to marijuana/THC in their work sites

 

  • We recommend an easy approach to this issue—start now and forever ban marijuana/THC in your workplace whenever possible

 

  • All states we are aware of allow you to legally stop its use in your work sites

 

  • If you don’t act before you get a marijuana user asking about it and you block that user and then start to ban its use, you are almost certainly looking at a discrimination action

 

More to follow next week.

 

 

Synopsis: Iannoni Reversed by IL Appellate Court—Employers Do Not Have to Pay Unaccrued PPD in Lump Sums.

 

Editor’s comment: I read a mildly shocking IL WC ruling on a national website about a Cook County Circuit Court judge who ordered the City of Chicago to pay unaccrued permanency in a lump sum, even though the money wasn’t yet “due.”

 

Acting as if no one could ever disagree with this new and unprecedented ruling, the Circuit Court judge also awarded something like $34K in penalties against the City for not paying in a lump sum along with just under $3,500 in interest. Holy cats!!!

 

The Court’s order said:

 

A permanent disability is immutable. It will not go away. The worker who suffers from a permanent disability is therefore entitled to a lump sum benefit in exchange for the loss of the complete use of their person. This is in sharp contrast to a temporary disability. It makes sense that temporary disability benefits would accrue on an installment basis during the pendency of the disability—the purpose of temporary disability benefits is to compensate the worker during their period of incapacity.

 

In my respectful view, the Circuit Court judge was simply wrong and the ruling cannot comply with the legislation he was analyzing. You will note there is a specific section of the IL WC Act that allows parties on either side to go in to our Commission within a certain time and seek more or less permanency—in short, the legislature understood “permanent disability is not immutable.”

 

I am happy to report the Circuit Court’s ruling was just unanimously overturned by our Appellate Court. If you want the link to the ruling, send a reply.

 

I appreciate your thoughts and comments. Please post them on our award-winning blog.

 

Illinois Chamber of Commerce Conference 10/8/19 

 

Register Today!

 Agenda will include:

 

 

7:30 a.m.–8:30 a.m. Registration and Breakfast Networking – Expo is open    

 

8:30 a.m.–8:55 a.m. Opening Remarks

 

Jay Shattuck, Executive Director Employment Law Council, Illinois Chamber of Commerce

Michael Brennan, Chairman, Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission 

 

8:55 a.m.–9:45 a.m. General Session – Medical and Recreational Marijuana in Illinois and the effect on WC Claims Handling   

 

Shuaib Ahmed, ASA Law Group  Shuaib Ahmed will dissect the Medical Cannabis Act, discuss both medical and recreational marijuana in Illinois and the challenges facing Employers navigating Workers’ Compensation claims.   

 

9:45 a.m.–10:10 a.m. Morning Break & Visit Exhibitors  

 

10:10 a.m. – 11:05 a.m. First Series of Workshops  

 

Workshop #1: Shawn Biery, John Campbell and Bradley Smith, Keefe Campbell Biery & Associates

 

Impact and Implications of SB 1596 (Civil Action may be brought against Employer)   Join John Campbell and Shawn R. Biery from Keefe, Campbell, Biery & Associates for a break out session discussing the impact and implications of SB 1596, as well as brainstorming strategies on how employers can best prepare to protect themselves. These veteran workers compensation defense attorneys will also cover relevant recent case law updates to provide guidance which will be helpful for anyone who deals directly or peripherally with workers’ compensation claims. Questions will be entertained throughout to drive the discussion toward specific avenues of interest from the audience.  

 

Workshop #2: Michael Teti, Digistream Investigations in the Age of Geosocial Data 

 

The current growth of geosocial data is changing the face of risk management and investigations. Learn what geosocial data is, and exactly how this type of information is used to uncover fraud and investigate insurance claims of all kinds. Understand how to gain eye-opening insight into accidents, site-security, workplace harassment, and high exposure incidents by locating social media photographs, videos and posts at specific locations and times anywhere in the world. The session examines successful real life cases, fascinating trends in social media, privacy and legal issues, as well as preserving, authenticating and presenting cyber evidence in court. Attendees will work with an understanding of best practices and ethical requirements for a successful geosocial investigation and how to add this new information into their already wide range of skills. 

 

 Workshop #3: Surbhi Saraswat Goyal and Charles Maring, Brady Connolly Masuda, P.C. Defending Work Injuries . . . Before They Happen!  

 

 In this workshop learn practical, low-cost strategies that employers can implement in-house to prepare for a work injury before it happens! Attorneys Surbhi Saraswat Goyal and Charles M. Maring, II reveal battle-tested strategies and helpful trial evidence that is beneficial in the defense of workers’ compensation claims. These strategies can help Employers, Human Resource and Safety Personnel meditate costs and protect the company’s interests. Know your rights as an employer and turn standard practices into assets!

 

 

11:10 a.m. – 12:05 p.m. Second Series of Workshops  

 

Workshop #1: Brian Clay, MD, Illinois Bone & Joint Institute Standardizing a Return to Work Protocol for Back Injuries in the Workplace   

 

Attendees will understand the markers of when a patient can return to work duty with low back pain, what to avoid, standard practices, and improvements in the process. By following a researched set protocol, return to work for low back injuries will be more efficient and economical. Attendees will also understand the insurance implications, cost saving, and improved return to work times for these patients by following a researched protocol.

 

 Workshop #2: Steve Murdock and Jynnifer Cotharn, Inman & Fitzgibbons, Ltd. Best Tools for Defense; Strategic Use of IMEs, Record Reviews, Utilization Reviews, Impairment Ratings 

 

Effective claims management often requires different strategies at different points in the litigation process. Understanding the tools that are available to help protect the insured’s interests is a critical part of claim handling. Should I get an IME? What are the benefits of obtaining a Utilization Review? How much weight is given to an impairment rating? In this seminar, we will address these questions along with four defense tools, their benefits and risks, and how each tool impacts cost and advancement of claims to closure. 

 

Workshop #3Jeffrey Risch, Smith Amundsen, LLC  OSHA Obligations and Workers Compensation in Illinois 

 

In this presentation, led by Labor & Employment Attorney Jeffrey Risch, attendees will receive the latest in employer OSHA obligations related to work related injuries and claims. From reporting and recording requirements, to drug testing rights and disciplinary options when an employee is involved with a work related injury due to an unsafe act or rule violation, attendees will hear the very latest on what employers must do, can do, shouldn’t do and can’t do when it comes to OSHA and work related injuries.

 

12:05 p.m. – 12:30 p.m. Visit Exhibitors & Networking Break

 

 

12:30 p.m.–1:30 p.m. Luncheon with Keynote Speaker 

    

The Intersection of Rx Opioids & Medical Marijuana Mark Pew, Senior Vice President, Product Development & Marketing, Preferred Medical  Medical cannabis as a substitute for prescription opioids continues to grow in the public (and private) discourse on pain management. Is that a surprise? For citizens of Illinois it should not be since last year’s introduction of the “Opioid Alternative Pilot Program”. But Illinois is not alone in the connection as per the January 24, 2019 blog post “Marijuana & Opioids” that listed three other states with an explicit connection (Colorado will officially make it five total in August 2019) and another six states with an implicit connection. While this connection is mostly political and anecdotal (based on personal stories and experiences) there is a growing amount of science (clinical studies) to substantiate the premise. This session will discuss the evolution in thought, present the anecdote and evidence behind the connection, highlight the implications for workplaces, and talk about how a drug-for-drug substitution might not be the full answer.

 

1:30 p.m.–2:30 p.m. Roundtable Discussion with Q&A 

 

Moderator: Jay Shattuck, Exec Dir Employment Law Council, Illinois Chamber of Commerce • Panelist: Amy Bilton, Nyhan Bambrick Kinzie & Lowry

Panelist: Dr. David Fletcher, Safeworks Illinois 

Panelist: Mike Brennan – Chairman, Illinois Workers Comp Commission 

 

Implementation of SB904 and discussion of billing and payment problems in the WC system

 

 2:30 p.m.– 3:00 p.m. Drawings for Prizes & Closing Remarks 



 3:00 pm  Adjourn

 

Contact Information

 

Questions on this event or other IL Chamber Business Services events?



Contact the Business Services Coordinator,

Kirsten Constant

 

P: 217-522-5512 Ext. 227

E: kconstant@ilchamber.org

 

 

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

9-25-2019; Shocking Record-High "Negligent Hiring" Verdict of $54M is Affirmed; New IL WC Commissioner Kathryn Doerries Appointed and More

Synopsis: Shocking IL Appellate Ruling That Might Set the Trucking Risk and HR Industry on Its Ear When Your Rigs Cross Anywhere Near the Nutty Land O’ Lincoln!! This $54M verdict is an IL Auto Claim Record.

Editor’s comment: In Denton v. Universal Am-Can, Ltd., (Issued September 24, 2019), a Cook County jury has awarded more than $54 million to a man who sustained head, neck and knee injuries after a semitrailer rear-ended his vehicle on an Indiana interstate.

Plaintiffs James Denton and his wife, Theresa, of Oak Lawn, sued David L. Johnson, the truck driver, and Universal Am-Can Ltd., Universal Truckload Services Inc. and Louis Broadwell LLC, Johnson’s employers, in 2015, alleging Johnson was negligent when he failed to slow down to avoid a crash as traffic unexpectedly changed. As you will read, the verdict didn’t really come from a bad-driving claim—it morphed into a “negligent hiring” action that lead to boxcar numbers.

The verdict is comprised of $19,155,900 in compensatory damages and $35 million in punitive damages--it totaled $54,155,900. According to John L. Kirkton of the Jury Verdict Reporter, the total verdict is higher than any Illinois auto personal-injury verdict that has previously been reported,

Driver Johnson “failed to keep a proper lookout” and was driving at 40 miles an hour when he rear-ended Plaintiff Denton in his Jeep. Plaintiff very effectively argued Johnson should not have been hired or retained by Universal Am-Can because of his “checkered driving record” and a felony conviction in 2004 arising out of a road-rage incident. From my view, every single driving boo-boo by this driver was repeated to the jury, as if his employer encouraged all of it.

Plaintiff Denton was driving south on Interstate 65 near Rensselaer, Ind., on Feb. 8, 2011, when traffic abruptly slowed because of a wrong-way driver traveling north in the interstate’s southbound lanes. George Kallis, 88 (who passed away during the pending proceedings) was driving the wrong way on the highway shoulder at approximately 30 mph. He did not strike any vehicles or sustain any physical injuries.

Counsel for Plaintiff indicated other trucks on the highway were able to slow their rigs and bring them to a stop — except for Johnson. “(Johnson) didn’t become aware of the wrong-way driver until after the crash,” Plaintiff Attorney Napleton said.

The defense argued, through the use of crash reconstruction expert, that the sole cause of the crash was Kallis, the wrong-way driver. Counsel for Plaintiff disagreed.

The defense also argued Johnson encountered a “hard brake” situation where he had no room on either side of the highway to move to another lane. Plaintiff Denton sustained injuries to his knees, back and neck and had nine surgeries. He continues to claim chronic pain syndrome related to his neck and back injuries and has to take narcotics to control his pain. Denton was not able to return to work as a regional vice president for Mohawk Industries.

In January 2015, a three-justice panel of the 1st District Appellate Court ruled Denton was hurt in the final stage of a chain-reaction that started with Kallis’ wrong-way driving. That opinion, Denton v. Universal Am–Can Ltd., 2015 IL App (1st) 132905, also indicated the Dentons settled with Kallis’ estate for $100,000 prior to filing their Cook County suit.

Writing for the appeals panel, Justice Terrence J. Lavin (who was a former and very successful Plaintiff lawyer) noted the differences in allocating fault between Illinois and Indiana and how they could affect an eventual award. “In Illinois, all defendants found liable are jointly and severally liable for the plaintiff’s past and future medical expenses,” Lavin wrote. “Indiana, by contrast, maintains that defendants can only be held severally liable for their own percentage of fault. … Moreover, Indiana law allows a defendant to prove the negligence of an absent or settling tortfeasor.”

The appeals panel explained the defense could attempt to persuade the jury that Kallis, though a nonparty to this case, was responsible for setting the crash in motion. Ultimately the jury in this case did not apportion any fault to Kallis. Jurors apportioned 40 percent of fault to Johnson individually and as an agent of Louis Broadwell and Universal, and 60 percent of fault to Universal for negligent hiring and/or retention.

The problem for the Trucking Industry is the jury found that all Defendants were negligent and the trucking company was negligent in hiring and retaining its employee who was the driver of a semi who had been convicted of 9 traffic-related offenses in the 7 years prior to applying, and whose license was suspended at time of accident.

The Appellate Court found the trial court correctly barred testimony as to the reduced rates providers accepted for Plaintiff's medical treatment under the collateral source rule, and properly applied Illinois law to that issue and to issue of allocation of punitive damages award. The Court also confirmed there was sufficient evidence supporting the punitive damages award, as extensive evidence was presented as to driver's poor driving history prior to applying to trucking company, and company's internal safety policies.

The Appellate Court noted the jury's finding of zero percent fault on the part of the driver who was driving the wrong way reflected the jury's belief that Plaintiff was injured as a result of the negligent and willful and wanton conduct of Defendants.

My concern for the entire U.S. trucking industry is there aren’t enough solid drivers with CDL’s out there. You need bodies to drive semis (until autonomous trucks arrive).  I am concerned some of the U.S. trucking HR people are taking on challenging hires, like the driver in this claim. When and if you make that mistake and someone gets hurt, even if you aren’t the true “cause” of the wreck, a bad driving record for the trucker involved may cause your exposures to get way into your excess layers. In short, you need to carefully consider hiring troublemakers and folks with poor driving records for lots of reasons, this verdict being one of them.

            -----------------------------------------

Synopsis: The Secret Squirrels who run the IL WC Commission Replace Former Commissioner Lamborn with Kathryn Doerries. We wish both all the best in their new ventures.

Editor’s comment: One odd thing about IL WC Commission management—the HR secrecy level for openings is close to that of nuclear armament handling. No one ever lets the media or public know of an opening and no one knows who/how to apply for a position.

 

We just learned Kevin Lamborn who did a solid job as a management Commissioner in his years at the IWCC, has been quietly sacked by whoever sacks such folks.

 

The new appointee is a mild surprise to me. Having practiced at the IWCC since the Iron Age or thereabouts, I have never met nor heard of Ms. Doerries that I recall. The IWCC notice that she was appointed said virtually nothing about her or her qualifications. The national work comp media didn’t report it at all. It is my understanding she is married to a solid defense attorney who I do know and have great respect for. To learn anything—something about Ms. Doerries, I looked her up on the web and found this on www.linkedin.com which I did edit a little bit. It is odd in 2019 to read she served a chief of the “Industrial Commission Bureau” when the joint has been called the Workers’ Compensation Commission for a very long time. Either way, here are some details about our new appointee.

 

Kathryn Doerries Attorney

 

  • Wheaton, Illinois

 

About 

 

  1. Served as Bureau Chief of Industrial Commission Bureau (??) to lead attorneys specializing in Workers’ Compensation defense before the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission (IWCC).

  2. First chair of numerous trials before the IWCC.

  3. Cross-examined witnesses and deposed medical experts in complex cases.

  4. Successfully resolved thousands of cases through negotiation and settlement or trial.

  5. Restructured entire department to create efficiencies and ensure consistency.

  6. Managed staff including hiring, mentoring and supervising.

  7. Drafted Proposed Findings for arbitrators’ decisions, many adopted in toto.

  8. Drafted and argued appeals before the IWCC.

 

EDUCATION & QUALIFICATIONS
J.D., The John Marshall Law School, Chicago, IL
B.A., University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana, IL
Active Member, Illinois Bar

As I indicate above, I join with the defense team at KCB&A and the IL WC community to welcome our newest Commissioner.

 

Illinois Chamber of Commerce Conference 10/8/19 

 

Register Today!

 Agenda will include:

 

 

7:30 a.m.–8:30 a.m. Registration and Breakfast Networking – Expo is open    

 

8:30 a.m.–8:55 a.m. Opening Remarks

 

Jay Shattuck, Executive Director Employment Law Council, Illinois Chamber of Commerce

Michael Brennan, Chairman, Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission 

 

8:55 a.m.–9:45 a.m. General Session – Medical and Recreational Marijuana in Illinois and the effect on WC Claims Handling   

 

Shuaib Ahmed, ASA Law Group  Shuaib Ahmed will dissect the Medical Cannabis Act, discuss both medical and recreational marijuana in Illinois and the challenges facing Employers navigating Workers’ Compensation claims.   

 

9:45 a.m.–10:10 a.m. Morning Break & Visit Exhibitors  

 

10:10 a.m. – 11:05 a.m. First Series of Workshops  

 

Workshop #1: Shawn Biery, John Campbell and Bradley Smith, Keefe Campbell Biery & Associates

 

Impact and Implications of SB 1596 (Civil Action may be brought against Employer)   Join John Campbell and Shawn R. Biery from Keefe, Campbell, Biery & Associates for a break out session discussing the impact and implications of SB 1596, as well as brainstorming strategies on how employers can best prepare to protect themselves. These veteran workers compensation defense attorneys will also cover relevant recent case law updates to provide guidance which will be helpful for anyone who deals directly or peripherally with workers’ compensation claims. Questions will be entertained throughout to drive the discussion toward specific avenues of interest from the audience.  

 

Workshop #2: Michael Teti, Digistream Investigations in the Age of Geosocial Data 

 

The current growth of geosocial data is changing the face of risk management and investigations. Learn what geosocial data is, and exactly how this type of information is used to uncover fraud and investigate insurance claims of all kinds. Understand how to gain eye-opening insight into accidents, site-security, workplace harassment, and high exposure incidents by locating social media photographs, videos and posts at specific locations and times anywhere in the world. The session examines successful real life cases, fascinating trends in social media, privacy and legal issues, as well as preserving, authenticating and presenting cyber evidence in court. Attendees will work with an understanding of best practices and ethical requirements for a successful geosocial investigation and how to add this new information into their already wide range of skills. 

 

 Workshop #3: Surbhi Saraswat Goyal and Charles Maring, Brady Connolly Masuda, P.C. Defending Work Injuries . . . Before They Happen!  

 

 In this workshop learn practical, low-cost strategies that employers can implement in-house to prepare for a work injury before it happens! Attorneys Surbhi Saraswat Goyal and Charles M. Maring, II reveal battle-tested strategies and helpful trial evidence that is beneficial in the defense of workers’ compensation claims. These strategies can help Employers, Human Resource and Safety Personnel meditate costs and protect the company’s interests. Know your rights as an employer and turn standard practices into assets!

 

 

11:10 a.m. – 12:05 p.m. Second Series of Workshops  

 

Workshop #1: Brian Clay, MD, Illinois Bone & Joint Institute Standardizing a Return to Work Protocol for Back Injuries in the Workplace   

 

Attendees will understand the markers of when a patient can return to work duty with low back pain, what to avoid, standard practices, and improvements in the process. By following a researched set protocol, return to work for low back injuries will be more efficient and economical. Attendees will also understand the insurance implications, cost saving, and improved return to work times for these patients by following a researched protocol.

 

 Workshop #2: Steve Murdock and Jynnifer Cotharn, Inman & Fitzgibbons, Ltd. Best Tools for Defense; Strategic Use of IMEs, Record Reviews, Utilization Reviews, Impairment Ratings 

 

Effective claims management often requires different strategies at different points in the litigation process. Understanding the tools that are available to help protect the insured’s interests is a critical part of claim handling. Should I get an IME? What are the benefits of obtaining a Utilization Review? How much weight is given to an impairment rating? In this seminar, we will address these questions along with four defense tools, their benefits and risks, and how each tool impacts cost and advancement of claims to closure. 

 

Workshop #3Jeffrey Risch, Smith Amundsen, LLC  OSHA Obligations and Workers Compensation in Illinois 

 

In this presentation, led by Labor & Employment Attorney Jeffrey Risch, attendees will receive the latest in employer OSHA obligations related to work related injuries and claims. From reporting and recording requirements, to drug testing rights and disciplinary options when an employee is involved with a work related injury due to an unsafe act or rule violation, attendees will hear the very latest on what employers must do, can do, shouldn’t do and can’t do when it comes to OSHA and work related injuries.

 

12:05 p.m. – 12:30 p.m. Visit Exhibitors & Networking Break

 

 

12:30 p.m.–1:30 p.m. Luncheon with Keynote Speaker 

    

The Intersection of Rx Opioids & Medical Marijuana Mark Pew, Senior Vice President, Product Development & Marketing, Preferred Medical  Medical cannabis as a substitute for prescription opioids continues to grow in the public (and private) discourse on pain management. Is that a surprise? For citizens of Illinois it should not be since last year’s introduction of the “Opioid Alternative Pilot Program”. But Illinois is not alone in the connection as per the January 24, 2019 blog post “Marijuana & Opioids” that listed three other states with an explicit connection (Colorado will officially make it five total in August 2019) and another six states with an implicit connection. While this connection is mostly political and anecdotal (based on personal stories and experiences) there is a growing amount of science (clinical studies) to substantiate the premise. This session will discuss the evolution in thought, present the anecdote and evidence behind the connection, highlight the implications for workplaces, and talk about how a drug-for-drug substitution might not be the full answer.

 

1:30 p.m.–2:30 p.m. Roundtable Discussion with Q&A 

 

Moderator: Jay Shattuck, Exec Dir Employment Law Council, Illinois Chamber of Commerce • Panelist: Amy Bilton, Nyhan Bambrick Kinzie & Lowry

Panelist: Dr. David Fletcher, Safeworks Illinois 

Panelist: Mike Brennan – Chairman, Illinois Workers Comp Commission 

 

Implementation of SB904 and discussion of billing and payment problems in the WC system

 

 2:30 p.m.– 3:00 p.m. Drawings for Prizes & Closing Remarks 



 3:00 pm  Adjourn

 

Contact Information

 

Questions on this event or other IL Chamber Business Services events?



Contact the Business Services Coordinator,

Kirsten Constant

 

P: 217-522-5512 Ext. 227

E: kconstant@ilchamber.org

 

 

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌